Notice bibliographique
- Notice
000 cam 22 3n 450
001 FRBNF474135420000002
010 .. $a 9798870775425 $b br. $d 19 EUR
020 .. $a FR $b 02422320
073 .0 $a 9798870775425
100 .. $a 20240208d2023 m y0frey50 ba
101 0. $a eng
102 .. $a FR
105 .. $a ||||z 00|y|
106 .. $a r
181 .0 $6 01 $a i $b xxxe
181 .. $6 02 $c txt $2 rdacontent
182 .0 $6 01 $a n
182 .. $6 02 $c n $2 rdamedia
200 1. $a Constitutional animal law $b Texte imprimé $f Olivier Le Bot
214 .0 $a [Saint-Maximin-La-Sainte-Baume] $c Olivier Le Bot $d 2023
215 .. $a 1 vol. (204 p) $d 26 cm
330 .. $a Constitutional animal law has become increasingly important in recent years. Some
countries, such as Germany, Brazil, Luxembourg and India, have included a specific
provision for the protection of animals in their constitutions. Such a provision has
a number of notable effects: the recognition of a right to conscientious objection;
the annulment of contrary acts; a basis for the limitation of fundamental rights;
an incentive to take action; a limit on actions harmful to animals; a referent for
the application and interpretation of the law; and a basis for legitimising criminal
offences. However, most countries do not have a specific constitutional provision.
In these cases, a basis is sought in provisions protecting the environment, recognising
the rights of nature, enshrining the right to life or protecting people. In the absence
of such recognition, constitutional litigation concerning animals focuses mainly on
fundamental rights, challenging laws that protect animals or regulate the conditions
of their use. $2 éditeur
686 .. $a 340 $2 Cadre de classement de la Bibliographie nationale française
801 .0 $a FR $b FR-751131015 $c 20240208 $g AFNOR $h FRBNF474135420000002 $2 intermrc
856 .2 $u 836243 $b Première de couverture
930 .. $5 FR-751131008:47413542001001 $a 2024-34277 $b 759999999 $c Tolbiac - Rez de Jardin - Droit, économie, politique - Magasin $d O
