Notice bibliographique
- Notice
Type(s) de contenu et mode(s) de consultation : Texte noté : sans médiation
Auteur(s) : Pigott, Justin M.
Titre(s) : New Rome wasn't built in a day [Texte imprimé] : rethinking councils and controversy at early Constantinople 381-451 / Justin M. Pigott
Publication : Turnhout : Brepols, DL 2019
Description matérielle : 1 vol. (XIII-231 p.) : couv. ill. en coul. ; 24 cm
Collection : Studia antiqua Australiensia ; Volume 9
Lien à la collection : Studia antiqua Australiensia
Note(s) : Bibliogr. p. 199-231
Texte remanié de : Thesis PhD : Center for Early Christian Studies : Brisbane, Australian
Catholic University : 2016
Le site de l'éditeur indique : "This book challenges long-held assumptions over New
Rome's meteoric growth in ecclesiastical standing, offering in their place a fundamentally
different reading of the early Constantinopolitan episcopate during the two landmark
councils of 381 and 451 and the seven tumultuous decades between them. Traditional
representations of Constantinople during the period from the First Council of Constantinople
(381) to the Council of Chalcedon (451) portray a see that was undergoing exponential
growth in episcopal authority and increasing in its confidence to assert supremacy
over the Churches of the east as well as to challenge Rome's authority in the west.
Central to this assessment are two canons - canon 3 of 381 and canon 28 of 451 - which
have for centuries been read as confirmation of Constantinople's ecclesiastical ambition
and evidence for its growth in status. However, through close consideration of the
political, episcopal, theological, and demographic characteristics unique to early
Constantinople, this book argues that the city's later significance as the centre
of eastern Christianity and foil to Rome has served to conceal deep institutional
weaknesses that severely inhibited Constantinople's early ecclesiastical development.
By unpicking teleological approaches to Constantinople's early history and deconstructing
narratives synonymous with the city's later Byzantine legacy, this book offers an
alternative reading of this crucial seventy-year period. It demonstrates that early
Constantinople's bishops not only lacked the institutional stability to lay claim
to geo-ecclesiastical leadership but that canon 3 and canon 28, rather than being
indicative of Constantinople's rising episcopal strength, were in fact attempts to
address deeply destructive internal weaknesses that had plagued the city's early episcopal
and political institutions."
Sujet(s) : Constantinople -- Histoire
Empire byzantin -- Jusqu'à 641
Concile de Constantinople (1 ; 0381)
Concile de Chalcédoine (451)
Indice(s) Dewey :
949.501 3 (23e éd.) = Histoire - Grèce - 0323-0717
Identifiants, prix et caractéristiques : ISBN 9782503584485 (br.). - ISBN 2503584489 (br.)
EAN 9782503584485
Identifiant de la notice : ark:/12148/cb45725693g
Notice n° :
FRBNF45725693
(notice reprise d'un réservoir extérieur)