Notice bibliographique
- Notice
000 cam 22 3 450
001 FRBNF455291800000001
010 .. $a 9789042936065 $b br.
010 .. $a 9042936061
035 .. $a OCoLC1038009096
100 .. $a 20190130d2018 m y0engy50 ba
101 0. $a eng
102 .. $a BE
105 .. $a y z 001y|
106 .. $a z
181 .0 $6 01 $a i $b xxxe
181 .. $6 02 $c txt $2 rdacontent
182 .0 $6 01 $a n
182 .. $6 02 $c n $2 rdamedia
200 1. $a The narrative of the Caucasian Schism $b Texte imprimé $e memory and forgetting in medieval Caucasia $f N. Aleksidze
214 .0 $a Lovanii $c in aedibus Peeters $d 2018
215 .. $a 1 vol. (xxxix-228 p.) $d 24 cm
225 |. $a Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium $i Subsidia $v tomus 137
300 .. $a Bibliogr. p. XI-XXXIX. Index
300 .. $a Source material in Georgian.
308 .. $a Collection principale : Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium. Numérotation
dans la collection principale : Vol. 666
328 .0 $z Texte remanié de $b Doctoral dissertation $e University of Oxford $d 2013 $t Remembering and forgetting the late antique Caucasus
330 .. $a In the early seventh century, the Georgian and the Armenian Churches separated. Since
then, the two nations formed their distinct Christian cultures and national Churches.
This also resulted in mutual antagonism, the repercussions of which are still observable
in modern Caucasia. This is the prevalent narrative that one encounters in modern
histories of medieval Caucasia. In the centre of this narrative lies the Schism, a
watershed that divides the history of Caucasia into two chronological constituents,
the era before and after. Indeed, the Schism is allegedly one of the most well documented
events in Caucasian history, infinitely evoked and referred to in medieval Armenian
historical accounts. The present study is an attempt to deconstruct this grand narrative
by focusing on the formation of the narrative of the Schism, its central element.
It argues that the narrative of the Schism was perpetually reconstructed and reinvented
by medieval historians for the purpose of sustaining teleological continuity in their
perception of the region's history. In the historical imaginaries of different medieval
writers in different times and places, the Schism served as an interpretive tool in
attempts to create a sound connection between the present and the forgotten past.
The Schism was once again reinvented in contemporary Armenian and Georgia national
discourses, and thence has made its way into scholarly studies
410 .0 $0 37582104 $t Corpus scriptorum christianorum orientalium $v 666
410 .0 $0 34240995 $t Corpus scriptorum christianorum orientalium. Subsidia $x 0070-0444 $v 137
606 .. $3 11980895 $a Schisme $3 13318330 $x Christianisme $3 11952725 $y Caucase $3 11977525 $z 7e siècle $2 rameau
801 .3 $a US $b OCoLC $c 20190130 $h 1038009096 $2 marc21
801 .0 $b ERASA $g rda
930 .. $5 FR-751131007:45529180001001 $a 2018-144677 $b 759999999 $c Tolbiac - Rez de Jardin - Philosophie, histoire, sciences de l'homme - Magasin $d O
930 .. $5 FR-751021006:45529180002001 $a 8-IMPR OR-20909 $b 759999999 $c Richelieu - Manuscrits - Magasin $d N
