Notice bibliographique
- Notice
000 02521c0 m 22000271 45a
001 FRBNF45477951000000X
008 180726s 2018 beeng b 001
009 ab d a
017 .. $o OCoLC $a 1041837645 $k ZWZ $l fre $m OCLCF $n ncafnor
020 .. $a 9782503569482 $b rel $a 250356948X $b rel
038 .. $a 9782503569482
041 0. $a eng $a lat
051 .. $a txt $b n
245 1. $a The |annotated book in the Early Middle Ages $d Texte imprimé $e practices of reading and writing $f edited by Mariken Teeuwen and Irene van Renswoude
260 .1 $a Turnhout $c Brepols $d 2018
280 .. $a 1 vol. (xii-783 p.) $c ill., fac-sims. $d 25 cm
295 1. $a Utrecht studies in medieval literacy $x 2034-9416 $v 38
300 .. $a Texte en anglais, extraits en latin
300 .. $a Notes bibliographiques de bas de page. Index
330 .. $a La 4e de couverture indique : "Annotations in modern books are a phenomenon that often
causes disapproval: we are not supposed to draw, doodle, underline, or highlight in
our books. In many medieval manuscripts, however, the pages are filled with annotations
around the text and in-between the lines. In some cases, a 'white space' around the
text is even laid out to contain extra text, pricked and ruled for the purpose. Just
as footnotes are an approved and standard part of the modern academic book, so the
flyleaves, margins, and interlinear spaces of many medieval manuscripts are an invitation
to add extra text. This volume focuses on annotation in the early medieval period.
In treating manuscripts as mirrors of the medieval minds who created them -- reflecting
their interests, their choices, their practices -- the essays explore a number of
key topics. Are there certain genres in which the making of annotations seems to be
more appropriate or common than in others? Are there genres in which annotating is
'not done'? Are there certain monastic centres in which annotating practices flourish,
and from which they spread?"